I'm an exponentially better chess player than a poker player, yet my "net profit" in chess is negative. I've been playing chess for 8 years, been playing poker for a little over 1 year. As a result most players know where they stand in terms of skill, and would never play for money against stronger opposition. In chess there is no variance, that allows for a rather objective skill measure in the rating system. A weak poker player doesnt know how weak he is and is willing to play for money against much stronger opposition. The point is that in poker variance helps mask the skill difference.
Only in over the board tournaments you can play chess for money, but the prize pool is often not that great and the skill level you need to win is extremely high. Please continue to give us your feedback and suggestions on how we can help make /r/chess better for everyone. Use the message the moderators link if your posts or comments don't appear, or for help with any administrative matters. Twitter/Facebook posts must contain a direct link to the tweet/post, and include the author's nameĬhess Spoiler format for problem answers etc., Instructions for /r/chess PGN addon ( Chrome, Firefox)ĭon’t engage in abusive, discriminatory, or bigoted behavior.ĭon't ask for advice about ongoing games.ĭo not use /r/chess exclusively to promote your own content. News Puzzles Games Strategy Twitch Other Resources
0 kommentar(er)
